Whitmer Kidnapping Plot

How to Create a Fake Resistance Movement

Whitmer Kidnapping Plot

How to Create a Fake Resistance Movement

The link below is to an interview done by Tim Pool with Brandon Caserta, who was found not guilty in the kidnapping plot of Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer, and an independent journalist, “Christina”.

The story is that the FBI befriended various shooting enthusiasts, Second Amendment supporters and anyone else who would fall into their trap, while portraying themselves as persons of a similar nature. They would go shooting and engage in various outdoor activities while setting up their victims to take a fall. At these events they would draw persons into conversations which could be taken out of context to use against them, and took pictures which would be manipulated for maximum threatening appearance.

It was reported that the conspirators drove North to the Governor's vacation cottage as part of their planning. The FBI would invite them on a drive north, FBI driving to go on a “land navigation exercise”, they would then drive past the Governor's cottage to provide said evidence. (Caserta says that they never actually drove past her cottage since they had the wrong address.)

Mr. Caserta describes how, one day at work he was asked to go to a certain room, whereupon he was tackled by several agents as though he were a foreign saboteur, but he had no idea why he was being arrested. (They did not even identify themselves as law enforcement or explain what he was being charged with.) They demanded to search his phone and his car, but he refused as they had no warrant. He found out that he was being charged with conspiring to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, a charge on which he was found not guilty in court. In his trial numerous lies were uncovered by his attorney. Mr. Caserta said that there were at least 12 FBI informants, 3 FBI agents and 6 charged. Afterwards, others were being charged with aiding and abetting if they had done anything providing support, even just teaching some skills. “Material Support.” The FBI claimed they were running a “terrorist training camp” even though the land used generally belonged to the Feds.

The initial story claimed that Trump had actually hired them, but that fell apart as information on the charged came out.

The prosecution provided a video showing what they claimed was the plan, but Caserta's lawyer picked apart the various absurdities.

The Feds set up fake internet profiles, Second Amendment groups and constitutionalist organizations, which people might join and enjoy while being selected for possible use as fall persons. It was revealed that the FBI maintains files concerning who they might set up.

Two of the younger informants were threatened with long, life ruining sentences if they did not take a plea deal, so they did. They had to admit to a conspiracy to kidnap the governor, and in doing so provided ammunition for the prosecutions to move forward. This was important because there was no real evidence. Consider though the two who plead guilty. In order to save their behinds they sold out the others as well as the country at large. Ultimately, there were two plea deals, two declared not guilty, and two convicted.

This arrests occurred right before the governor's re-election in October, an October surprise.

Similar tactics had been used on Muslim Americans wherein they would be drawn into an artificial conspiracy, provided with a bomb and then immediately arrested. Was the FBI protecting America, or trying to make the FBI look good,or what?

Listening to this account is chilling; the depths to which the FBI sank just to provide enemies to prosecute. I suggest listening to at least the first half hour, then a discussion regarding the events at the Michigan Capitol, starting at about 48 minutes. During the extreme lock-down conditions in Michigan there was a protest at the capitol in Lansing. There were second amendment supporters in full gear with rifles and whatnot. The FBI asked the capitol police to allow them into the capitol, which they did. The video of them shouting in the capitol was shown on the news the next day without an explanation that it was allowed. The Detroit FBI director who orchestrated this was then moved to Washington D.C., where he officiated at the January 6 festivities.

How many of the crimes and terrorist acts that we hear about are setups? How much of the news in general, if it not fake, is at least biased by means of leaving out relevant facts? How much of our trouble comes the mere fact that people will sell their honor for a little advantage? Situations like this take time to develop, and there seems to be an effort to polarize the populous which helps operations of this type work. Is this evidence that the Deep State feels like they are losing power, so they start doing desperate things?

The more people that see through lies, the less power the powerful have. Because people are seeing through this case they have less belief in the January 6 narrative.

Become more self sufficient. That undercuts the power of the powerful.

Pursuant to all of this, I want to list the five rules of propaganda, that I like to print when relevant:

The Five Rules of Propaganda

2. The rule of simplification - reducing all data to a simple confrontation between 'Good and Bad', 'Friend and Foe'.

3. The rule of dis figuration - discrediting the opposition by crude smears and parodies.

4. The rule of transfusion - manipulating the consensus values of the target audience for one's own ends.

5. The rule of unanimity - presenting one's viewpoint as if it were unanimous opinion of all right-thinking people: draining the doubting individual into agreement by the appeal of star-performers, by social pressure , and by 'psychological contagion'.

6. The rule of orchestration - endlessly repeating the same messages in different variations and combinations.

And my substack article on propaganda:

https://drp314.substack.com/p/propaganda-thoughts

The whole operation seems to be one large propaganda and disinformation campaign.