Thanks. I encourage anyone and everyone to put ideas for questions in the comments so we can trade ideas. Look for opportunities to get the questions out there.
Did you know the United Nations is planning to seize “global emergency powers" with President Joe Biden’s support? It's true. Under a shocking new plan that is scheduled to be adopted two months before the U.S. presidential election in 2024, all it would take is some sort of a major “global shock”, for immediately enabling the United Nations to literally take political authority over the entire planet. A July 4 article (link below) in The Federalist first broke the story. Unfortunately the mainstream/Pravda media in the United States is not covering this at all, so most people have absolutely no idea this is going on. To many readers this may sound like a conspiracy theory, but this is actually what is being proposed, and the Biden administration is fully behind this insidious plan.
In the month of September 2024, UN global representatives will gather for “the Summit of the Future”, and during that conference UN member states are scheduled to officially ratify a “Pact for the Future”. Once enacted, the “Pact for the Future” grants global powers to the U.N. plan for a new “emergency platform” - a stunning proposal to give the U.N. significant powers in the event of future “global shocks,” such as; “major climatic event,” “future pandemic risks,” a “global digital connectivity disruption,” “major event in outer space,” and generic “unforeseen risks”, (‘black swan’ events).”
The proposal is the biggest attempted power grab in the history of the United Nations. If approved, the United States and the inalienable rights guaranteed in the US Constitution could cease to exist:
Would they be able to enforce it? I don't know the answer to that, but they may not be able to. Would your local sheriff enforce laws made by them, especially if they violate the U.S. Constitution? (Biden may believe the Constitution is kaput, but it comes down to enforcement.)
Yes, James Rogusky on Substack has been closely following this, the pandemic treaty, and the worldwide power grab by UN and WHO. It's all disgusting. I'm glad to see that the Federalist covered it...that is great. Good for them. And thanks for sharing the link.
It is my humble opinion that our Constitutional Republic permanently fell during the 2016 presidential election on July 5 when then FBI Director James Comey “exonerated” Hillary Clinton for her illegal server and the thousands of her classified emails. At that point in history the “rule of law” began its demise and because the constitutional provisions for remedy to the ensuing felonious acts and omissions (think FISA Court) of James Comey, (et.al) were never pursued; our Constitutional Republic has fallen and is irreparable…... And the four unconstitutional indictments of Donald J. Trump is my proof
Please be cognizant, the Comey/Hillary Clinton exoneration was three weeks prior to the July 2016 Oval Office meeting orchestrated by President Barack Hussein Obama and Valarie Jarett and attended by Vice President Joe Biden, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, national security adviser Susan Rice and CIA Director John Brennan.
According to CIA Director John Brennan’s handwritten notes, Brennan informed attendees of “alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016, of “a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.” In other words, a scandal about collusion with Russia. According to a CIA memo, the intent of this plan was “distracting the public from her use of a private email server.”
Later it was shown that the plan was enacted via the Steele dossier, which Robby Mook, Clinton’s former campaign director, acknowledged under oath in 2022 to have procured. So explosive were Brennan’s notes that U.S. senators needed a federal court order, issued four years after Obama’s Oval Office meeting, to wrest a copy of it from the Department of Justice. Released along with Brennan’s notes was a copy of a CIA memo sent to FBI Director James Comey and Peter Strzok, the deputy assistant director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division, delineating the Barack Hussein Obama’s Oval Office meeting’s discussion.
Therefore as We the People encounter the 2024 election cycle, it is wise to conduct yourselves as living is a “Post-Constitutional Republic”. I compare it to the time of Jesus Christ living in Roman occupied Jerusalem.
Once thing I can tell you is that when Hillary Clinton got away with her obvious federal crimes in the midst of the 2016 election cycle and the press was not reporting the truth about it, this was the moment that I knew that our country was no longer the country I grew up in.
Would you support the repeal of the Sixteenth Amendment? How about the elimination of backup withholding?
How about the repeal of the Seventeenth Amendment?
What are your thoughts on retrocession of all but the public parts (the Mall, Capitol, White House, memorials, etc.) of the District of Columbia to Maryland to solve the "no taxation without representation" complaint by DC residents?
Kleptocracy (from Greek "I steal", and "power, rule") is a government whose corrupt leaders (kleptocrats) use political power to expropriate the wealth of the people and land they govern, typically by embezzlement or misappropriation of government funds at the expense of the wider population. Thievocracy means literally the rule by thievery and is a term used synonymously to kleptocracy. One feature of political-based socioeconomic thievery is that there is often no public announcement explaining or apologizing for misappropriations, nor any legal charges or punishment levied against the offenders.
Kleptocracy is different from plutocracy (rule by the richest) and oligarchy (rule by a small elite). In a kleptocracy, corrupt politicians enrich themselves secretly outside the rule of law, through kickbacks, bribes, and special favors, or they simply direct state funds to themselves and their associates. Also, kleptocrats often export much of their profits to foreign nations in anticipation of losing power.
What is Rent-Seeking?
Rent-seeking is the act of growing one’s personal wealth without creating any new wealth, by manipulating the social or political environment. Rent-seeking activities have negative effects on the rest of society. They result in reduced economic efficiency through misallocation of resources, reduced wealth creation, lost government revenue, heightened income inequality, and potential national decline. Rent-seeking is an attempt to obtain economic rent (i.e.:The portion of income paid to a factor of production from land, labor, capital, entrepreneur, in excess of what is needed to keep it employed in its current use) by manipulating the social or political environment in which economic activities occur, rather than by creating new wealth.
The term “rent-seeking'' was first coined by 19th-century British economist David Ricardo; but only became the subject of durable interest among economists and political scientists more than a century later after the publication of two influential papers on the topic by Gordon Tullock in 1967, and Anne Krueger in 1974. The word "rent" does not refer specifically to payment on a lease but rather to Adam Smith's division of incomes into profit, wage, and rent.
Love this article and love the questions you pose. Of course our modern day Pravda would never ask real questions.
I would add:
- Would you support abolishing the Fed?
- Would you support an audit of all spending bills that go through Congress - past and present
- Would you fight the govt's of use of propaganda on its own people?
- How would you fight the govt's spying on its own citizens?
- Do you support decentralizing our monetary system?
- Would you pass Schedule F to make all govt. employees firable?
- Would you work to get rid of all voting machines? How else would you bring back fair and free
elections? Do you support going back to 1-day voting, paper ballots, voter ID required, American
citizens only get to vote, purging voter roles of people who have died, moved to another state?
- How would you ensure that American's are not censored online or anywhere?
- Would you fight CRT and inappropriate sexual topics in schools?
- Do you recognize more than two genders? (an immediate disqualifier for any yes's)
- What would you do to make sure that Americans are not categorized as domestic terrorists simply
based on their political views?
- Do you support term limits?
- How would you work to fight corruption in govt?
- Would you make American taxpayers pay for foreign wars? For illegal immigrants' housing and
healthcare?
- Would you withdraw the US from international organizations and treaties that are trying to steal
our sovereignty, like the UN and the WHO
- How will you fight the Great Reset, Agenda 21, Agenda 30x30, and Net Zero carbon goals?
- Will you prosecute those who perpetrated the COVID 19 bioweapon and false pandemic/genocide
and sterilization program on people everywhere for crimes against humanity?
- Would you support prohibiting mandates that involve bodily autonomy?
- How will you reform Big Pharma?
- How do you fix the 2-tier justice system?
- How do you remove the entire, corrupt Deep State/Administrative state?
- How do you make politicians accountable to the people again?
That's off the top of my head...I'll probably think of more later ; )
Thanks for an enjoyable read!
Thanks. I encourage anyone and everyone to put ideas for questions in the comments so we can trade ideas. Look for opportunities to get the questions out there.
Did you know the United Nations is planning to seize “global emergency powers" with President Joe Biden’s support? It's true. Under a shocking new plan that is scheduled to be adopted two months before the U.S. presidential election in 2024, all it would take is some sort of a major “global shock”, for immediately enabling the United Nations to literally take political authority over the entire planet. A July 4 article (link below) in The Federalist first broke the story. Unfortunately the mainstream/Pravda media in the United States is not covering this at all, so most people have absolutely no idea this is going on. To many readers this may sound like a conspiracy theory, but this is actually what is being proposed, and the Biden administration is fully behind this insidious plan.
In the month of September 2024, UN global representatives will gather for “the Summit of the Future”, and during that conference UN member states are scheduled to officially ratify a “Pact for the Future”. Once enacted, the “Pact for the Future” grants global powers to the U.N. plan for a new “emergency platform” - a stunning proposal to give the U.N. significant powers in the event of future “global shocks,” such as; “major climatic event,” “future pandemic risks,” a “global digital connectivity disruption,” “major event in outer space,” and generic “unforeseen risks”, (‘black swan’ events).”
The proposal is the biggest attempted power grab in the history of the United Nations. If approved, the United States and the inalienable rights guaranteed in the US Constitution could cease to exist:
https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/04/the-u-n-is-planning-to-seize-global-emergency-powers-with-bidens-support/
Would they be able to enforce it? I don't know the answer to that, but they may not be able to. Would your local sheriff enforce laws made by them, especially if they violate the U.S. Constitution? (Biden may believe the Constitution is kaput, but it comes down to enforcement.)
Yes, James Rogusky on Substack has been closely following this, the pandemic treaty, and the worldwide power grab by UN and WHO. It's all disgusting. I'm glad to see that the Federalist covered it...that is great. Good for them. And thanks for sharing the link.
It is my humble opinion that our Constitutional Republic permanently fell during the 2016 presidential election on July 5 when then FBI Director James Comey “exonerated” Hillary Clinton for her illegal server and the thousands of her classified emails. At that point in history the “rule of law” began its demise and because the constitutional provisions for remedy to the ensuing felonious acts and omissions (think FISA Court) of James Comey, (et.al) were never pursued; our Constitutional Republic has fallen and is irreparable…... And the four unconstitutional indictments of Donald J. Trump is my proof
Please be cognizant, the Comey/Hillary Clinton exoneration was three weeks prior to the July 2016 Oval Office meeting orchestrated by President Barack Hussein Obama and Valarie Jarett and attended by Vice President Joe Biden, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, national security adviser Susan Rice and CIA Director John Brennan.
According to CIA Director John Brennan’s handwritten notes, Brennan informed attendees of “alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016, of “a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.” In other words, a scandal about collusion with Russia. According to a CIA memo, the intent of this plan was “distracting the public from her use of a private email server.”
Later it was shown that the plan was enacted via the Steele dossier, which Robby Mook, Clinton’s former campaign director, acknowledged under oath in 2022 to have procured. So explosive were Brennan’s notes that U.S. senators needed a federal court order, issued four years after Obama’s Oval Office meeting, to wrest a copy of it from the Department of Justice. Released along with Brennan’s notes was a copy of a CIA memo sent to FBI Director James Comey and Peter Strzok, the deputy assistant director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division, delineating the Barack Hussein Obama’s Oval Office meeting’s discussion.
Therefore as We the People encounter the 2024 election cycle, it is wise to conduct yourselves as living is a “Post-Constitutional Republic”. I compare it to the time of Jesus Christ living in Roman occupied Jerusalem.
Alas, I believe your synopsis is correct.
Once thing I can tell you is that when Hillary Clinton got away with her obvious federal crimes in the midst of the 2016 election cycle and the press was not reporting the truth about it, this was the moment that I knew that our country was no longer the country I grew up in.
A few other questions off the top of my head:
Would you support the repeal of the Sixteenth Amendment? How about the elimination of backup withholding?
How about the repeal of the Seventeenth Amendment?
What are your thoughts on retrocession of all but the public parts (the Mall, Capitol, White House, memorials, etc.) of the District of Columbia to Maryland to solve the "no taxation without representation" complaint by DC residents?
A lot of good ones already.
You would probably have to explain what the amendment is. They are usually not too knowledgeable.
What is a Kleptocracy?
Kleptocracy (from Greek "I steal", and "power, rule") is a government whose corrupt leaders (kleptocrats) use political power to expropriate the wealth of the people and land they govern, typically by embezzlement or misappropriation of government funds at the expense of the wider population. Thievocracy means literally the rule by thievery and is a term used synonymously to kleptocracy. One feature of political-based socioeconomic thievery is that there is often no public announcement explaining or apologizing for misappropriations, nor any legal charges or punishment levied against the offenders.
Kleptocracy is different from plutocracy (rule by the richest) and oligarchy (rule by a small elite). In a kleptocracy, corrupt politicians enrich themselves secretly outside the rule of law, through kickbacks, bribes, and special favors, or they simply direct state funds to themselves and their associates. Also, kleptocrats often export much of their profits to foreign nations in anticipation of losing power.
What is Rent-Seeking?
Rent-seeking is the act of growing one’s personal wealth without creating any new wealth, by manipulating the social or political environment. Rent-seeking activities have negative effects on the rest of society. They result in reduced economic efficiency through misallocation of resources, reduced wealth creation, lost government revenue, heightened income inequality, and potential national decline. Rent-seeking is an attempt to obtain economic rent (i.e.:The portion of income paid to a factor of production from land, labor, capital, entrepreneur, in excess of what is needed to keep it employed in its current use) by manipulating the social or political environment in which economic activities occur, rather than by creating new wealth.
The term “rent-seeking'' was first coined by 19th-century British economist David Ricardo; but only became the subject of durable interest among economists and political scientists more than a century later after the publication of two influential papers on the topic by Gordon Tullock in 1967, and Anne Krueger in 1974. The word "rent" does not refer specifically to payment on a lease but rather to Adam Smith's division of incomes into profit, wage, and rent.