I do recall being pleasantly surprised that when the gov of NM recently put out an order to ban guns in her state, that the state's AG and one of the Sheriffs took a stand and said they would not comply with this unconstitutional order. We need a lot more people to stand up to tyranny like that. Little by little, more Americans are waking up.
We can be very powerful in large numbers. We must all NOT comply.
Existential decisions must well precede the time of crisis, which I suppose is the objective of the article. Everyone must take responsibility for their decisions in the near future, when time and options will be scarce in pressing situations. Would you, for instance, board a FEMA bus after the government declares a state of emergency and announces a new plandemic?
Nobody will come for the weapons. If the globalists' goal is depopulation before achieving full control, which it is, they can create food, water, and energy shortages and the well-armed population will do the favor and kill each other for a can of soup. They can do that anytime, because they control production and distribution. Against an uprising, they could, and would, use drones and robotic infantry that never swore to defend the country, and I still haven't mentioned Directed Energy Weapons, satellite IR tracing and targeting, chemtrails, and the kitchen sink. They can use toxins and microwave weapons to create the illusion of a "pandemic" (they WILL do this soon), and once people start dropping dead in the street, the survivors will plead with the "government" to restore "order," that is order out of the chaos the rulers have created. They can also blame "the Chinese," "the Russians," blow up a few dirty bombs in metropolitan areas in order to start WW3 on TV or project holographic images into the sky and fake an "alien invasion." Are the people outgunned? They surely are. Still, some of them might refuse to be turned into cyborg slaves. It's best to know when survival is not the highest priority:
The rest must be adjusted to personal, regional, and local options. The military has been "vaccinated" and, as such, its members can be controlled remotely:
Yes, let’s cower in our basements until we die. If they had no desire to take the weapons they would not be working so hard to disarm the people. It is indeed chilling what can be done, but don’t assume they will hold all the cards. Some people take their oaths seriously.
I don't think it will depend on oaths ever taken. The situations will determine a lot more. And no, even "they" don't have unlimited resources, but water and food shortages will stop most people. Hit-and-run doesn't work against drones or a robotic infantry.
The disarmament is a red herring. They will take it more seriously, once they introduce martial law, but I don't think they would have enough stupid armed personnel to try to carry it out and they don't have an infinite number of drones and machines. For them, the simplest way is to wait until people kill off each other and only a few are left that can be hunted down one by one.
Rolling over is an option for everyone, but only a few are likely to take it. What someone does, is their own decision. Backyard bunkers and even prepaid bunkers are death traps:
When people and their children are starving or have no access to potable water, cities will be death traps. In rural areas, looters will be shot on sight. Sharing your scarce resources with "fugitives" is likely to achieve only one thing: they will consider you weak, stupid, or both, and they might end up trying to borrow your 16-year-old daughter, too... When people run out of food, they have "allies" no longer; I wouldn't even trust my neighbor, who, I'm sure, places his four young children ahead of me and my wife. Trying to defend a house even in a rural area is also nonsense, though.
A lot to think about. I have had a couple of thoughts. One is, perhaps they do not plan on doing anything soon. The world's population is probably shrinking now due to you know what, so all they have to do is wait, but maybe for quite a while. They may not want to inherit a wrecked world but would prefer the dead to be buried, old buildings torn down and etc. When most of the population is gone in comes the hammer, but they would want a disarmed populous. Ed Dowd has some numbers, and with good data one could estimate a half life. The uneducated third-worlders would be vaxxxed soon enough.
They might (or might not) be smart enough to realize that if they unleash something like this they are likely to be swept away in the chaos. They may be arrogant enough to think they can control it, but that does not seem likely to me. Many things would happen that they don't expect, and the price of arrogance is foolishness.
A little aside, to counter drones you need a device that interferes with the drones contact with GPS. I believe that is what is being used on Maui to stop people from flying them over Lahaina.
In the absence of government, WROL, tribes will begin to form and their will be hundreds if not thousands of warlords. I would picture it more like many very tiny kingdoms against each other rather than quite the neighbor vs. neighbor, but that would happen too.
In my essays I want to send a message; they say resistance is futile and I say it isn't.
Some of my thoughts on war, in case you haven't seen it:
They have definitely slowed down, although if they started the shortages, the people will make up for it in a jiffy. Personally, I think, it will be best to stay out of those encounters, but they won't take longer than a few weeks.
No need for the "authorities" (enablers and enforcers only, because the masters won't even live on this continent) to hunt down the remaining outsiders, because only a few will last longer than a few months. Dissenters will have to live off-grid, and ammo eventually runs out, forcing people back to the stone age. Those will pose no threat to the "civilized" parts. As long as there is no concentration of warm bodies, the satellites will ignore them (but I estimate the threshold at three, which includes a large dog, if there is one). Those who live long enough until the technocratic world collapses, will make it, and it would be possible to go up to the Middle Ages technologically in communities of 100-150 people.
There will be no face-off, but the following shows what free men can do:
I also think that unless the technocrats are totally insane, they must preserve part of humanity intact, but I can imagine that only on remote, self-sustaining islands or, perhaps, isolated mountain communities.
I believe that there will be highly-trained and highly-informed dissenters, who might even have the equipment to take over logistics centers, although such centers would be probably annihilated by the occupying forces, if lost to them. If satellites could be disabled, much of the enemy's coordinating capacity would be taken out, but if I were the system designer, I would make sure my system has power backups and I can deprive the opposition from power with the flick of a switch (and can even blame it on hackers, EMPs, or solar flares). The whole thing is like a game of chess in which most of the hope of winning comes from the enemy underestimating the resistance, but to me it looks like it couldn't be much underestimated, because the real capacity is so low to begin with.
My convictions are briefly summarized in the links in my previous comment.
Beyond that, I also consider this more of a spiritual than a physical battle. That's actually a reason why I am not particularly optimistic that humans deserve to survive (yes, last time I checked, I'm one of them).
What will be the response to truck-bombs, gutting health care installations performing routine "vaccinations" on children, at night, when no one is present.
Hit-and-run under infrared shields might work for harassing occupying forces. I can't see how metropolitan areas could survive the crisis, and doing what you are saying now would only speed up the introduction of martial law. In fact, I am surprised that such attacks still haven't been used as false flags...
"Everyone must take responsibility for their decisions" I completely agree with your statement. 194th Armored Brigade Fort Knox. Trained U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground Iam unvaccinated. God bless America Vote President Trump 2024🇺🇸🇺🇸 Make no mistake they will protect their power and money at any cost
"Why are the elites so invested in disarming the people? Possibly they feel like they cannot truly control the people until they have the power of the unchallenged knock on the door in the middle of the night, and that's what they want."
That is exactly what they want.
I've always suspected that if push indeed came to shove, it would be random acts of guerilla warfare, not coordinated, one with others.
I do believe that at some point, high-tech is susceptible to low-tech, and if true, exploiting high-tech's vulnerabilities would be an edge.
I imagine the military will split 50/50, much like they rest of the country. My son was in the Reserves a decade ago. He once asked members of his company if they would fire on US citizens if given the order. Some relished the thought, some were horrified, others said, "You gotta follow orders ", and a few were undecided. He told me it was split pretty much down the middle, yays and nays, of the fifty or so he asked.
I do recall being pleasantly surprised that when the gov of NM recently put out an order to ban guns in her state, that the state's AG and one of the Sheriffs took a stand and said they would not comply with this unconstitutional order. We need a lot more people to stand up to tyranny like that. Little by little, more Americans are waking up.
We can be very powerful in large numbers. We must all NOT comply.
Our sheriff didn't enforce the muzzles, either. :)
Existential decisions must well precede the time of crisis, which I suppose is the objective of the article. Everyone must take responsibility for their decisions in the near future, when time and options will be scarce in pressing situations. Would you, for instance, board a FEMA bus after the government declares a state of emergency and announces a new plandemic?
Nobody will come for the weapons. If the globalists' goal is depopulation before achieving full control, which it is, they can create food, water, and energy shortages and the well-armed population will do the favor and kill each other for a can of soup. They can do that anytime, because they control production and distribution. Against an uprising, they could, and would, use drones and robotic infantry that never swore to defend the country, and I still haven't mentioned Directed Energy Weapons, satellite IR tracing and targeting, chemtrails, and the kitchen sink. They can use toxins and microwave weapons to create the illusion of a "pandemic" (they WILL do this soon), and once people start dropping dead in the street, the survivors will plead with the "government" to restore "order," that is order out of the chaos the rulers have created. They can also blame "the Chinese," "the Russians," blow up a few dirty bombs in metropolitan areas in order to start WW3 on TV or project holographic images into the sky and fake an "alien invasion." Are the people outgunned? They surely are. Still, some of them might refuse to be turned into cyborg slaves. It's best to know when survival is not the highest priority:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freedom-is-what-freedom-does-but
One must not allow to be divided and isolated:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-most-important-thing-anyone-can
The rest must be adjusted to personal, regional, and local options. The military has been "vaccinated" and, as such, its members can be controlled remotely:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/zombie-armies
Yes, let’s cower in our basements until we die. If they had no desire to take the weapons they would not be working so hard to disarm the people. It is indeed chilling what can be done, but don’t assume they will hold all the cards. Some people take their oaths seriously.
I don't think it will depend on oaths ever taken. The situations will determine a lot more. And no, even "they" don't have unlimited resources, but water and food shortages will stop most people. Hit-and-run doesn't work against drones or a robotic infantry.
The disarmament is a red herring. They will take it more seriously, once they introduce martial law, but I don't think they would have enough stupid armed personnel to try to carry it out and they don't have an infinite number of drones and machines. For them, the simplest way is to wait until people kill off each other and only a few are left that can be hunted down one by one.
Rolling over is an option for everyone, but only a few are likely to take it. What someone does, is their own decision. Backyard bunkers and even prepaid bunkers are death traps:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-you-have-a-getaway-plan
When people and their children are starving or have no access to potable water, cities will be death traps. In rural areas, looters will be shot on sight. Sharing your scarce resources with "fugitives" is likely to achieve only one thing: they will consider you weak, stupid, or both, and they might end up trying to borrow your 16-year-old daughter, too... When people run out of food, they have "allies" no longer; I wouldn't even trust my neighbor, who, I'm sure, places his four young children ahead of me and my wife. Trying to defend a house even in a rural area is also nonsense, though.
A lot to think about. I have had a couple of thoughts. One is, perhaps they do not plan on doing anything soon. The world's population is probably shrinking now due to you know what, so all they have to do is wait, but maybe for quite a while. They may not want to inherit a wrecked world but would prefer the dead to be buried, old buildings torn down and etc. When most of the population is gone in comes the hammer, but they would want a disarmed populous. Ed Dowd has some numbers, and with good data one could estimate a half life. The uneducated third-worlders would be vaxxxed soon enough.
They might (or might not) be smart enough to realize that if they unleash something like this they are likely to be swept away in the chaos. They may be arrogant enough to think they can control it, but that does not seem likely to me. Many things would happen that they don't expect, and the price of arrogance is foolishness.
A little aside, to counter drones you need a device that interferes with the drones contact with GPS. I believe that is what is being used on Maui to stop people from flying them over Lahaina.
In the absence of government, WROL, tribes will begin to form and their will be hundreds if not thousands of warlords. I would picture it more like many very tiny kingdoms against each other rather than quite the neighbor vs. neighbor, but that would happen too.
In my essays I want to send a message; they say resistance is futile and I say it isn't.
Some of my thoughts on war, in case you haven't seen it:
https://drp314.substack.com/p/some-disjointed-thoughts-on-war
Stay brave, stay free David
They have definitely slowed down, although if they started the shortages, the people will make up for it in a jiffy. Personally, I think, it will be best to stay out of those encounters, but they won't take longer than a few weeks.
No need for the "authorities" (enablers and enforcers only, because the masters won't even live on this continent) to hunt down the remaining outsiders, because only a few will last longer than a few months. Dissenters will have to live off-grid, and ammo eventually runs out, forcing people back to the stone age. Those will pose no threat to the "civilized" parts. As long as there is no concentration of warm bodies, the satellites will ignore them (but I estimate the threshold at three, which includes a large dog, if there is one). Those who live long enough until the technocratic world collapses, will make it, and it would be possible to go up to the Middle Ages technologically in communities of 100-150 people.
There will be no face-off, but the following shows what free men can do:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/arbeit-macht-frei-is-that-where-freedom
I personally have a lower level of tolerance, so I probably won't last that long. :)
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freedom-is-what-freedom-does-but
I also think that unless the technocrats are totally insane, they must preserve part of humanity intact, but I can imagine that only on remote, self-sustaining islands or, perhaps, isolated mountain communities.
I believe that there will be highly-trained and highly-informed dissenters, who might even have the equipment to take over logistics centers, although such centers would be probably annihilated by the occupying forces, if lost to them. If satellites could be disabled, much of the enemy's coordinating capacity would be taken out, but if I were the system designer, I would make sure my system has power backups and I can deprive the opposition from power with the flick of a switch (and can even blame it on hackers, EMPs, or solar flares). The whole thing is like a game of chess in which most of the hope of winning comes from the enemy underestimating the resistance, but to me it looks like it couldn't be much underestimated, because the real capacity is so low to begin with.
Still, resistance is not meaningless.
Don't know what your beliefs are, but I think there are higher powers involved, on both sides.
My convictions are briefly summarized in the links in my previous comment.
Beyond that, I also consider this more of a spiritual than a physical battle. That's actually a reason why I am not particularly optimistic that humans deserve to survive (yes, last time I checked, I'm one of them).
Bleak, but it would be a mistake to ignore the truth contained therein.
The only way to prepare and have at least a breathing chance is by considering the options for the occupying forces.
What will be the response to truck-bombs, gutting health care installations performing routine "vaccinations" on children, at night, when no one is present.
Hit-and-run under infrared shields might work for harassing occupying forces. I can't see how metropolitan areas could survive the crisis, and doing what you are saying now would only speed up the introduction of martial law. In fact, I am surprised that such attacks still haven't been used as false flags...
"Everyone must take responsibility for their decisions" I completely agree with your statement. 194th Armored Brigade Fort Knox. Trained U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground Iam unvaccinated. God bless America Vote President Trump 2024🇺🇸🇺🇸 Make no mistake they will protect their power and money at any cost
"Why are the elites so invested in disarming the people? Possibly they feel like they cannot truly control the people until they have the power of the unchallenged knock on the door in the middle of the night, and that's what they want."
That is exactly what they want.
I've always suspected that if push indeed came to shove, it would be random acts of guerilla warfare, not coordinated, one with others.
I do believe that at some point, high-tech is susceptible to low-tech, and if true, exploiting high-tech's vulnerabilities would be an edge.
I imagine the military will split 50/50, much like they rest of the country. My son was in the Reserves a decade ago. He once asked members of his company if they would fire on US citizens if given the order. Some relished the thought, some were horrified, others said, "You gotta follow orders ", and a few were undecided. He told me it was split pretty much down the middle, yays and nays, of the fifty or so he asked.